tesl630-REPLIES-Discussion Thread: Technology and Mental Processes
Question
**You will need to already own the book: Introduction to Language 11th edition By Victoria Fromkin, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams.
**I will have 2 different discussions uploaded to the files. Each discussion needs its own response of at least 150 words and its own citations and references. Example: Discussion one-Needs a reply with at least 150 words with its own citations and references and Discussion two- Needs a reply with at least 150 words with its own citations and references. * I also uploaded the 2 discussions, and the actual assignment, just pay attention specifically about replying back to two classmates sections. When responding back, please be kind, and do not correct any of the comments or disagree, write in a first-person, such as -I agree with, I like how you, etc.- Also please just use the book from above for this assignment, and, if necessary another source for examples and such. Also, I am an American and English is my first language, so it should be from my point of view, thank you.
Discussion one
Understanding how language and the brain work together to
acquire language would aid me in becoming a better teacher. An exceptional
English as a Second Language teacher understands that acquiring language is
much more than knowing grammar and rules. It involves an unconscious process of
using language as a means of communication among humans. Fromkin et. al.
states "Ordinarily we have no difficulty understanding or producing
sentences. We do it without effort or conscious awareness of the processes
involved." This allows teachers to create lessons that are task-based,
encouraging students to use language to communicate. This knowledge also allows
for effective instruction by encouraging the teacher to use various tools to
encourage language learning including cooperative learning. This allows
students to focus on conveying meaning while incorporating the grammar
knowledge they have learned. Faltis states " When the primary goal of
bilingual teaching is comprehension through translation, rather than enabling
students to understand concepts, principles and processes through exchanges and
the negotiation of meaning, joining the community of knowledge in either
language is difficult." (Faltis, 1996) This type of teaching focuses on
creating authentic and engaging language experiences for students. This allows
for them to use different areas of the brain that encourage the acquisition of
language.
Teachers use the knowledge of the human brain to develop
lessons that promote peer interactions using the basic social target language
skills as well as academic language. This also challenges educators to scaffold
instruction to accommodate for students of various proficiency levels while
having them work together on tasks. The scaffolding can include various visual
and written aids to help students complete the tasks while using the target
language. This knowledge also encourages teachers like myself to
create learning opportunities for students to use critical thinking skills.
This would also involve using all four language domains including speaking,
listening, writing and reading. This active engagement forces students to
synthesize the grammar knowledge they have while using areas of the brain in
charge of communication and human interaction. Using the target language
through positive interactions among peers encourages social relationships and
raises the level of empathy among peers. This also promotes whole-brain
activity encouraging students to acquire the language using all areas of the
brain.
Faltis, C. (1996). Learning to Teach Content Bilingually in
a Middle School Bilingual Classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 20(1),
29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1996.10668618
Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams. An Introduction to Language. Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2011. Print.
Discussion two
Question 1. Describe how understanding more of how language
and brain work together can aid you in becoming a better teacher. How can you
use this information in your classes and with your students?
Psycholinguistics is an area of experimental
linguistics that is concerned with linguistic performance—how we use our
linguistic competence—in speech (or sign) production and comprehension,
(Fromkin, Rodman, & Hyams, 2018). Studying the relations between
language and the brain constitutes an object that concerns many and diverse
disciplines. It represents, without a doubt, one of the most relevant chapters
in the historical development of psycholinguistics and forms the central
nucleus of the current contents of Neurolinguistics and its strict implication
in the treatment of language disorders and language acquisition. Teachers
need to understand how ESOL students’ brains adjust to acquiring the L2.
Per Fromkin, “As we might expect, the units we perceive depend on the
language we know, especially its phonemic inventory” (Fromkin, Rodman, &
Hyams, 2018). Thus, difficulties acquiring the sounds of a second
language (L2) are explained by the phenomenon known as transfer or interference
(transfer) of the first language (L1). The brain behaves very differently
in learning a second language than in the first if we learn them at different
times in our lives. When learning our first language, we tend to easily use
grammar rules, although, on many occasions, we are not able to explain them as
they are explicit. In the second, grammar knowledge is explicit, as we usually
learn another language, and we need to know its rules beforehand. However, if
we learn both languages at the same time, the same brain area will relate to
both languages and put them in contact to generate more complex schemes.
Learning a second language can be approached in different
ways. Reading can be one of those fun and motivating activities that make
learning a second language attractive and fun for children. In addition,
stories allow children to understand the world around them and promote their
development. For this reason, it is a good idea to promote its use as a
fundamental part of the natural learning of a language. Reading is about
recognizing letters and how they combine into words and then how they connect
to the sounds they make and their meaning. This is how reading is not only a
visual process, as was believed at some point. It is also an auditory
process. Our brain elaborates the meaning by finding meaning to the
relevant ideas of a text and relating them to the concepts that it already has
as meaning; but even more, our capacity is directed to think about what we take
for meaning, that is, we can conclude, creation of the mind.
Understanding how language and brain work together can help me as a teacher by
learning the strategies that I need to use in the classroom, what methods of
instruction do I need to add or change. By doing so, I can help my ESOL
students achieve a better second language learning experience.
References
Fromkin V., Rodman R., & Hyams N. (2018). An
Introduction to Language. [MBS Direct]. Retrieved
from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337671279/
Criteria |
Levels
of Achievement |
|||
Content
70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not
present |
Thread: Key Components |
6 to 7 points All key components of the discussion prompt are answered in
the thread. The thread has a clear, articulate logical flow. Communication follows the student expectations in the
Course Overview. |
5 points Most of the components of the discussion prompt are answered
in the thread. The thread has a basic, logical flow.
|
1 to 4 points The discussion prompt is addressed minimally. The thread
lacks flow or content.
|
0 points
|
Thread: Major Points |
6 to 7 points The following items were clearly integrated: ·
Reading materials. ·
Pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples. ·
Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions,
analyzing implications, and comparing or contrasting concepts). ·
Integration of biblical principles. |
5 points Most of the following items were integrated: ·
Reading materials. ·
Pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples. ·
Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions,
analyzing implications, and comparing or contrasting concepts). ·
Integration of biblical principles. |
1 to 4 points The following items are absent or minimally integrated: ·
Reading materials. ·
Pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples. ·
Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions,
analyzing implications, and comparing or contrasting concepts). ·
Integration of biblical principles. |
0
points
|
Replies: Substance |
13 to 14 points Each reply focuses on a meaningful point made in another
student’s thread. Each reply provides substantive additional thoughts
regarding the thread and an explanation of why the student agrees or
disagrees with the idea presented in the thread. Each reply is clear and
coherent. Communication follows the student
expectations in the Course Overview. |
12 points Most replies focus on a meaningful point made in another
student’s thread. Most replies provide substantive additional thoughts
regarding the thread and an explanation of why the student likes or dislikes
the idea presented in the thread. Most replies are clear and coherent. |
1 to 11 points Some replies focus on a point made in another student’s
thread. Replies could be more substantive regarding the thread. Replies lack
clarity and coherence. |
0
points
|
Structure
30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
Thread: Grammar, Spelling, Formatting |
6 points Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete,
clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence
structures. Proper formatting style is employed with minimal to no errors.
Thread required word count (400 words) is met. |
5 points Some spelling and grammar errors are present. Sentences are
presented well. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures. Proper
formatting style was partially employed with minimal errors. Thread required
word count (400 words) is met. |
1 to 4 points Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are
incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Formatting style was
employed with several errors or absent altogether. Thread required minimum
(400) word count is not met. |
0
points
|
Replies: Grammar, Spelling, Formatting |
6 points Two replies were provided. Spelling and grammar are
correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain
appropriately varied sentence structures. Proper formatting style is employed
with minimal to no errors. Reply required word count (150 words) for each
reply is met. |
4 to 5 points Some spelling and grammar errors are present. Sentences are
presented well. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures. Proper
formatting style was partially employed with minimal errors. Reply required
word count (150 words each) is met.
|
1 to 3 points Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are
incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Formatting style was
employed with several errors or absent altogether. Reply required word count
(150 words each) for each reply is not met. |
0
points
|


Solution
Replies: Technology and Mental Processes
Reply to Discussion One
I fully support the fact
that becoming a good teacher is heavily reliant on knowing the relationship
between language and the brain. Therefore, Fromkin et al (2011) happen to
be true when saying that getting to know a particular language is more beneficial
than knowing the rules and grammar. Students can communicate and apply
grammatical knowledge gained through the guidance of teachers. In this case,
teachers can also apply knowledge in ensuring that there are positive
interactions by using both language and academic skills. Therefore, teachers
often face the challenge of ensuring that the instructions given are
accommodative for all the learners based on their proficiency skills to promote
unity when working on some tasks. For example, they apply visual and written
aids as the target language for students with various needs (Zwiers, 2013). In this case, such knowledge enables me to apply the four
language domains, listening, speaking, reading and writing to encourage
positive interactions, social relationships and encouraging students to apply
critical skills when working on tasks.
Reply to Discussion Two
I truly agree that the brain is essential when it comes to an
understanding a particular language. The relationship between the brain and
language is essential because it determines a teacher’s linguistic competence
when speaking and performing (Fromkin et al, 2011). This study is central to
the research done by Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics and helps manage
both language acquisition and disorders. All the things perceived are highly
reliant on the language people know. That is why there are some difficulties in
knowing the second language due to what is called interference transfer. The
brain acts differently when acquiring a second language, but learning both at
the same time might be somehow easy. However, learning the second language can
be treated as fun when the activities involved are motivating as they ensure
that children can understand the concepts being taught (Zwiers, 2013). Reading is not only visual but also an auditory
process. Therefore, getting a clue of the connectivity between language and the
brain is essential to me as a teacher. It equips me with the required
strategies and teaching methods to ensure ESOL students can understand the
second language.
References
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R.,
& Hyams, V. (2011). An Introduction to language, 9e. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 8(76), 78-199.
Zwiers, J. (2013). Building academic language: Essential
practices for content classrooms, grades 5-12. John Wiley & Sons.



About Author
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!
We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.
Find the right expert among 500+
We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.
View all writers