Clinical Practice Guideline Policy
Question
Research and Statistical Analysis
Appraising a Clinical Guideline
At the completion of this assignment, the learner will:
- Demonstrate the ability to concisely summarize a clinical practice guideline.
- Develop an appropriate appraisal.
- Analyze the evidentiary strength and quality of guideline recommendations.
- Make recommendations for policy or practice change based on the analysis.
The following are links to two guidelines. You may choose one (1) of these to analyze.
https://www.guidelines.gov/summaries/summary/49491
Read the guideline and do the following:
1. Briefly summarize the guideline and include the nursing issue or health issue the guideline addresses, specific interventions considered for inclusion in the guideline, the major expected outcomes from using the guideline and the targeted population for which the guideline is intended. (This must be in narrative form, not a list. (40 points)
2. Describe in detail and in your own words the methodology, or process, that was used to develop the guideline. (15 points). This should include the following:
- Search method used to find articles
- What inclusion/exclusion criteria were used to limit article numbers
- Final number of articles used
- Method used to analyze the articles (e.g., systematic review)
- Method used to form the recommendations
- Statement of external peer/public review for validity
3. List each recommendation contained in the guideline (If there are more than 3 recommendations, limit the number to 3). Describe the level(s) of evidence (quality) and strength of evidence that support each recommendation (Because different organizations view levels of evidence in different ways, use the levels of evidence as described in the specific guideline). Recommendations should lead to outcomes that are measureable (10 points)
4. Looking at the criteria for appraising a guideline, appraise the guideline using the AGREE Grid for Guideline Appraisal (attached) (25 points)
5. Think about how you could use the guideline to recommend changes in your practice area based on the evidence you have obtained (10 points).
Appraising a Clinical Guideline
The following are criteria by which one evaluates the quality of a clinical guideline. As you read the guideline, use the modified AGREE format to appraise its strengths and weaknesses. If you rate anything lower than “Completely Meets Criteria”, you need to provide a brief rationale for your rating. (modified from: Hanson, Hoss, & Wesorick, 2008)
Scoring
Each section of a guideline is rated according to the following:
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
Score as Insufficiently Meets Criteria if there is no information that is relevant to the item or if the criteria are very poorly reported. Give rationale why you chose this category.
Score as Completely Meets Criteria if the quality of reporting is exceptional and easily understood.
Score for Partially Meets Criteria is assigned when the reporting of the item does not address the item fully. A score is assigned depending on the completeness and quality of reporting. Give rationale why you chose this category.
1. Quality and Purpose: The overall objective, clinical question, and patient population are specifically described.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
|
2. Stakeholders: Development group has appropriate credentials, users of the guideline are identified appropriately, users of the guideline have provided a peer review.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
|
3. Rigor of Development: The method used to search for evidence is clearly described, including key terms and databases used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, process for selecting articles, and final number of articles considered.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
|
4. Rigor of Development: Method for formulating recommendations is clearly described, recommendations are specific and clearly linked to the evidence, each recommendation is supported by an appropriate rating scheme, recommendations have undergone external review.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
|
5. Implementation: Barriers to implementation and/or cost implications are clearly considered.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
|
6. Editorial independence: Guideline developers are independent from the funding organization and any conflicts of interest of developers clearly described
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
|
Solution
Clinical Practice Guideline Policy
1. Guideline Summary
Best evidence statement (BEST) aims at assessing nurses providing care or education in healthcare facilities. The directive examines if the participation in the mentoring program as well as team building enhances satisfaction and retention of nurses. The target population of the BEST guideline is the registered nurses providing care or education in care settings (NGC, 2013). The guideline was obtained from the electronic database and was reviewed by two independent reviewers to determine its validity. BEST examines primary points of care and does not preclude care modalities of studies published after the current revision of the guideline. The document is applicable in management and staff collaboration to facilitate the establishment of the criteria that allows one to become a mentor and the process of formulating a mentorship program. Conflicts of interests, as well as financial disclosures, are also presented in the guideline whereby dispute of interest forms are filed with no financial conflicts of interest (NGC, 2013). The direction offers multiple sessions that are crucial for the nurses to support the sustainability of the mentoring program.
2. Methodology Used to Develop BEST Guideline
The electronic databases that include Medline, CINAHL, Google Scholar and OhioLink were used to obtain credible information sources to develop the guideline. The search keywords were used such as nurse relationships, team building, nurse retention, and healthy work environment. The results were filtered in the English language with no date limit. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were based on the table of evidence levels that indicated the strength of the evidence presented in each source. The guideline does not specify the number of the source documents obtained after the search. However, 13 references were selected to support the recommendation. Review of published meta-analysis and systematic review approaches were used to analyze the articles, while expert consensus strategy was used to formulate a proposal (NGC, 2013). The statement for external review for validity indicates that two independent reviewers have reviewed the BEST against quality from CCHMC Evidence Collaboration.
3. Recommendations
Strength |
Recommendation |
It is strongly recommended that |
When applying the strength of the evidence for the judging dimensions, there is the high support that benefits and outweighs risks as well as burdens. |
It is recommended that |
When applying the strength of the evidence for the judging dimensions, there is a presence of moderate support that benefits and are carefully balanced with the burdens and risks. |
4. Appraising BEST Guideline
1. Quality and Purpose: The overall objective, clinical question, and patient population are accurately described.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
AGREE The guideline gives objective and clinical question but lacks patient population on the applicability of the approach. Instead, it describes its use by the nurses. |
|
2. Stakeholders: Development group has appropriate credentials, users of the guideline are identified appropriately, and users of the guideline have provided a peer review.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
AGREE |
|
|
3. The rigor of Development: The method used to search for evidence is clearly described, including key terms and databases used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, the process for selecting articles, and a final number of articles considered.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
AGREE The guideline provides the key terms, databases and inclusion and exclusion criteria, but fails to give the final number of articles selected. It only lists 13 sources supporting recommendations. |
|
4. The rigor of Development: Method for formulating recommendations is clearly described, recommendations are specific and clearly linked to the evidence, each recommendation is supported by an appropriate rating scheme, and proposals have undergone external review.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
AGREE |
|
|
5. Implementation: Barriers to implementation and cost implications are explicitly considered.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
AGREE The guideline presents the cost implications but fails to clearly identify challenges or barriers faced during the implementation process |
|
6. Editorial independence: Guideline developers are independent of the funding organization and any conflicts of interest of developers clearly described.
Completely Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Insufficiently Meets Criteria |
|
|
AGREE The guideline does not clear regulations governing developer’s independence. Instead, it only presents the copyright policy that controls instructions posted on the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) |
5. How to use the Guideline to Recommend for Changes Nursing
The BEST guideline is essential in nursing collaboration and management through the establishment of the criteria followed by a nurse to become a mentor as well as formulating the framework of the mentorship program (NGC, 2013). The guideline may also be used to match new nurses with a mentor and to specify duration within which the new nurses should work under a mentor. The directive is also helpful in designing team building sessions. As articulated by Pipe et al. (2012), the process incorporates identifying the appropriate location and schedule for the sessions as well as the convenient nurses to attend. The BEST guideline can also be used to change the current mentoring program for the new nurses by utilizing hospital human resource department to oversee the mentorship and team building interventions. The use of BEST strategy will ensure that nurses receive directions from their respective mentors to carry out their day to day care activities.
References
National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). (2013, Mar. 25). Best evidence statement (BESt). Team building and mentoring for increased satisfaction and retention. Retrieved from https://www.guidelines.gov/summaries/summary/44353/best-evidence-statement-best-team-building-and-mentoring-for-increased-satisfaction-and-retention?q=guidelines+for+nurse+educators
Pipe, T. B., Buchda, V. L., Launder, S., Hudak, B., Hulvey, L., Karns, K. E., & Pendergast, D. (2012). Building personal and professional resources of resilience and agility in the healthcare workplace. Stress and Health, 28(1), 11-22.
About Author
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!
We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.
Find the right expert among 500+
We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.
View all writers