Private Organizations Vs. Public Organizations
Question
Discuss how private organizations differ from public organizations in terms of motivational tools. Recall that private organizations have the incentive of financial bonuses that are difficult for criminal justice agencies to generate


Solution
Private Organizations Vs. Public
Organizations
A private
organization is any non-profit or non-government-run partnership, institution, individual,
or entity. It includes all for-profit businesses that aren't run or overseen by
the government. A public organization
is a company branch that focuses on products and services that affect the
general public and community. The government owns and operates public
organizations and funds them through taxation. Essentially, the differences are motivational variables or tools used by
employees in private and public businesses (Lambin, 2018). Workers in the
private sector are motivated primarily by motivational tools such as financial
compensation, notably bonuses, which are granted after an employee efficiently
and successfully performs a work activity that leads to the organization's
growth (Lambin, 2018). On the other
hand, private companies have traditionally prioritized the safety of their
workers in the company by implementing measures that aim to prevent any harm or
injury to them. As a result, the staff is encouraged and driven to work and
achieve their highest levels without fear of damage or injury.
In private
organizations, which differ from governmental organizations, good working
conditions and a supportive environment are crucial factors. Private businesses
have procedures to ensure that their employees have a pleasant and productive
working environment. For example,
they establish a regulation that any smoking within a reasonable distance of
the workplace is strictly prohibited. Any employee who falls victim is subject
to disciplinary action (Lambin, 2018)—clearly stating that discrimination or
harassment against other employees is strictly forbidden—assuring that
employment decisions are made based on merit rather than prejudice or bias.
Furthermore, private businesses promote teamwork, employee participation in
decision-making, and the recognition of top performers. It gives employees a
sense of ownership in the organization, that their ideas and opinions are valued,
and that they are supported to achieve their personal and organizational
objectives. Employees in
public organizations are most often encouraged by motivational tools like being
educated about opportunities for advancement in their careers, a good wage, more
work-life balance, and various training, specialties, and adventures (Lambin,
2018). motivational tactics must be varied to achieve the company's goals. Both
governmental and private entities may use this method. Because private
businesses are driven by profit, they have more leeway in motivating personnel.
They can subsequently use earnings to help challenge personnel inside the company
(Sergi et al.,2019). Managers
require fully motivated government workforces to flourish in these apparent
circumstances. It necessitates that public-sector leaders recognize and address
why expanding public-sector involvement is a unique task.
An Australian
software firm allows workers to function on any project they want for 24 hours
if they distribute the results. This policy would reduce profits for the time
being, but it has resulted in various product improvements and bug remedies in
the long run. Public organizations are far more inflexible and have more
bureaucracy than private companies (Sergi et al.,2019). As a result,
individuals are not challenged because they may not apply their effort
correctly. Large bureaucracy suffocates creativity and innovation inside
government agencies and other public bodies (Sergi et al.,2019). As a result,
motivation suffers, as does the capacity to utilize motivating methods as
swiftly as private enterprises. Similarly, there is typically a minor
motivation because these groups are not profit-motivated and instead rely on
the United States government for support. As a result, the organization's
desire to enhance processes regularly is hindered.
References
Lambin, E. F., & Thorlakson, T.
(2018). Sustainability standards: Interactions between private actors, civil
society, and governments. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43,
369-393.
Sergi, B. S., Popkova, E. G.,
Borzenko, K. V., & Przhedetskaya, N. V. (2019). Public-private partnerships
as a mechanism of financing sustainable development. In Financing Sustainable Development (pp. 313-339).
Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.




About Author
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!
We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.
Find the right expert among 500+
We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.
View all writers