Confidential Informants
Question
Watch the following video (link), conduct some research, and then produce an essay response that answers the questions below. Make sure to support your answers with information from outside sources.
https://youtu.be/VBiXcfrP_4s
1. Define and discuss confidential informants and their role in criminal investigations.
2. Evaluate their use in terms of the controversy surrounding them.
3. What are the common motivations of informants?


Solution
Confidential
Informants
Define
and discuss confidential informants and their role in criminal investigations
Confidential informants, also known as criminal
informants, provide information about criminal activity to law enforcement
officials. They are often used in criminal investigations, as their collected information
identifies and apprehends criminals. Confidential informants can provide various
types of information, such as the identities of other criminals, the location
of illegal activity, or details about criminal activity. The use of
confidential informants is controversial, as some believe that they are often
used to coerce people into becoming informants, and their information is not
always reliable. It is difficult to estimate how often confidential informants
are used in criminal investigations, as they are often secretive. However, they
play a significant role in many cases. For example, confidential informants investigated
a drug task force in Mississippi. In this case, the confidential informants
were University of Mississippi students paid by the task force to provide
information about drug activity on campus. The use of confidential informants is
important for investigating criminal activity, but it is significant to ensure
all the collected information is reliable and not biased when providing
information.
There are a variety of motivations that can lead
someone to become a confidential informant. Some people may be motivated by
money, as they may receive financial compensation for their information. Others
may be motivated by revenge or a desire to help law enforcement. In some cases,
people may be coerced into becoming informants, as they may be threatened with
arrest or prosecution if they do not cooperate. The use of confidential
informants is a controversial practice, as it can lead to the coercion of people
and the dissemination of unreliable information. However, confidential
informants play a significant role in many criminal investigations.
Evaluate
their use in terms of the controversy surrounding them.
The use of confidential informants (CIs) in criminal
investigations has always been controversial. Some feel that CIs are essential
to law enforcement and play a crucial role in breaking cases. Some feel that
CIs are often overused, unreliable, and can lead to wrongfully convicted
innocent people. There is no denying that CIs have helped law enforcement solve
many cases. In some instances, CIs have even been able to provide information
that has led to the prevention of crimes. For instance, in the case of the
Lafayette Metro Narcotics Unit, CIs were able to provide information that
helped the unit make nearly 1,000 arrests (Stucky, Newby, & Nunn, 2007).
However, there is also no denying that CIs can be overused and that their use
can sometimes lead to innocent people being caught up in the criminal justice
system. In the case of the Lafayette Metro Narcotics Unit, it is clear that the
unit was using CIs to try to make as many drug arrests as possible (Lieberman,
2007). This ultimately led to the unit targeting college students who were
likely to have small amounts of drugs. While this may have helped the unit
boost its arrest numbers, it also likely led to many innocent people being
caught up in the criminal justice system.
The use of CIs is also controversial because of the
potential for abuse. In many cases, CIs are given leniency in exchange for
their information. This can create a situation where CIs are given an incentive
to lie or exaggerate information to get a reduced sentence. In some cases, CIs
have even been known to fabricate information entirely (Lieberman, 2007). This
can lead to innocent people being accused and convicted of crimes they did not
commit. Some CIs cases may be pressured to provide information by law
enforcement. This pressure can come in the form of threats or promises of
leniency. In other cases, CIs may be misinformed or mistaken. Regardless of the
reason, false information from CIs can have devastating consequences. For
example, it is reported that CIs were used to target students at the University
of Mississippi. These students were then pressured to provide information about
drug activity on campus. However, many of these students were never involved in
any illegal activity. This resulted in innocent students being investigated and
even arrested. The use of CIs also raises some ethical concerns. For example,
law enforcement should be allowed to offer leniency to CIs in exchange for
information (Lieberman, 2007). CIs should be given complete immunity from
prosecution. These are difficult questions to answer. However, it is significant
to consider the potential consequences of using CIs before making any
decisions.
Overall, the use of CIs is a controversial topic with
pros and cons. While CIs have helped law enforcement solve many crimes, they
have also been responsible for wrongful convictions and ethical concerns. For
instance, the use of CIs in the University of Mississippi case led to innocent
students being investigated. This highlights the need for more oversight and
regulation when it comes to the use of CIs.
What
are the common motivations of informants?
There are many reasons people choose to become
confidential informants (CIs). Some people do it for money, others do it for
revenge, and others do it because they feel like it is their civic duty. CIs
play a vital role in many criminal investigations regardless of the reason.
Without them, many crimes would go unsolved. For example, in the article above,
the students who became CIs were able to help police investigate and ultimately
arrest drug dealers on their campus.
Some CIs are motivated through money. They may receive
a cash payment for their information or a reduced sentence in their criminal
case in exchange for their cooperation. The article above noted that the Metro
Narcotics task force received funding based on the number of arrests they made
(Ward, 2005). This provides an incentive for task force members to encourage
CIs to make drug buys to make more arrests. Other CIs are motivated by revenge.
The person may have wronged them they are giving information about and want to
see that person punished. They may also believe that by helping convict a
criminal, they are making their community safer. Still, other CIs feel like their
civic duty is to help police solve crimes. They may have witnessed a crime and
want to see the perpetrator brought to justice. They may also argue that
cooperating with police is effective, even though they don’t know the victim or
the perpetrator personally.
One of the most common motivations for becoming a CI
is money. In many cases, CIs are offered leniency in exchange for their
information. This can incentivize them to provide false or inaccurate
information to secure a lighter sentence for themselves. In other cases, CIs
are paid outright for their information. This can also lead to CIs providing
false or misleading information to make a quick buck. For instance, in the
article above, the Metro Narcotics unit offered students $1,000 for information
that led to an arrest. This could incentivize some students to provide false
information to receive the money.
Another common motivation for becoming a CI is
revenge. In some cases, people become CIs to get back at someone who wronged
them. For instance, someone arrested for drug possession might become a CI to
get revenge on their dealer. This can lead to CIs providing inaccurate or false
information to get the person they seek revenge against arrested or convicted.
References
Lieberman,
B. (2007). Ethical issues in the use of confidential informants for narcotic
operations. Police Chief.
Stucky,
T., Newby, B., & Nunn, S. (2007). Analysis of Byrne/JAG Programs Administered
by the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute: Multi-jurisdictional (Drug) Task
Forces, 2006 and 2007.
Ward,
D. V. (2005). Confidential Informants in National Security
Investigations. BCL Rev., 47, 627.




About Author
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!
We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.
Find the right expert among 500+
We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.
View all writers