Criminal Justice Annotated Bibliography

Criminal Justice Annotated Bibliography

Bright, C. L., Ferrell, J., Winters, A. M., Betsinger, S., & Lee, B. T. (2018). Family-Centered Treatment, Juvenile Justice, and the Grand Challenge of Smart Decacration. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(5), 638-635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517730127

The authors of this study recommend several different options to keep people out of prison while providing care and rehabilitation to prevent future offenses. First, the authors look at the decarceration of young people's brains. The research compared the efficacy of FTC and GC, both family-centered interventions. Treatment at home. Aside from a children's home, other facilities provide group care. Repeatable adjudication and adult sentence should be FTC's strong suit. State and administrative Federal Trade Commission databases were used in this study. According to the study, FCT and GC do not differ considerably. A study by the Federal Trade Commission found that it reduced recidivism among young people. The FTC's youth programs can take the place of those offered by GC. All of the data supporting the hypothesis was accurate. A total of 1,527 samples and five months of treatment for FTC were collected. One thousand six hundred sixty samples were needed for GC. According to the report, 17 percent of FTC members and 23 percent of GC members were jailed. However, there are flaws or limitations to this well-researched document. Data from both state and external sources were obtained. The study's findings were equally as important as the time it took for the patient to receive therapy. For the FTC's success, the report investigated re-adjudication, attitude when caught for the first time, treatment lengths, and treatment conditions. Adult penalties were also examined.

Kim, I., & Barkol, R. (2004). The "Safe School": A Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Model of Community Policing as an Expression of Democratic Processes. International Journal Of Educational Reform, 13(1), 27-45. doi: 10.1177/105678790401300103

Here, a paradigm for reducing juvenile delinquency is provided to unite the community and find solutions to its problems. This article discusses the suppression and resolution of behavioral disorders in schools. This essay focuses on preventing juvenile delinquency by police and the community, which also explores neighborhood policing and school violence (safe school model). For this reason, rehabilitation rather than punishment is a better option because it focuses on the problem in schools, where youngsters spend most of their time rather than incarceration. However, students' needs are not being met when there is violence in the school, which is a concern.

Calley, N. G. (2007). Integrating theory and research: The development of a research-based treatment program for juvenile male sex offenders. Journal of Counseling & Development. 85(2). 131-142. Retrieved from https://eds-a-ebscohost-com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=ef709e69-1761-4f1d-8e40- da26ee51ab44%40sessionmgr4006

This article focuses on teenage abuse treatment. In the 1990s, over 7,000 teenagers were found guilty of sex crimes. These crimes may be triggered by mental illness, substance abuse, or a lack of social support. Decision-making is hindered by drug use. Children might be negatively influenced by parents who exhibit poor parenting skills. NAPN believes that a juvenile should be treated for one to two years because of the seriousness and difficulties of sexual assault and juvenile delinquency. New methods have emerged due to the work of cognitive behavioral therapists (CBT). Patients and doctors work better when they trust and respect each other. In light of this, Milieu was enlightened. Many researchers collaborated in large-scale house studies, utilizing three different approaches to develop it. The past of the patient is the primary subject of cognitive autobiography. Finally, there is the emotional autobiography and the history of traumatic events. ' The patient's victim status, feelings, and arousal are all addressed in this step. Criminal history, sexual orientation, and drug use comprise the fourth group. A sexual assault's commencement and end are the focus of this course. The patient's motivations are the focus of the vicious cycle, which comes in at number five. Relapse and reintegration are the topics of the last module. You can avoid repeat infractions the first time around. According to the research, better outcomes can be achieved with early detection and treatment. Well-researched theories were also included in the analysis. In the end, research led to a more effective treatment plan. The information in this article is based on research, so it is a reliable source of information. It is fine since the authors linked theory, research, and practice. The article's sections and explanations are pretty interesting to me. Certain criminals may not be suited to this method because of their circumstances. Sexual assaults on children involve theories, research, and application to find the appropriate response. We can treat and rehabilitate offenders once we recognize the problem.

Fagan, J. (2010). The contradictions of juvenile crime and punishment. Daedalus. 139(3). 43-61. Retrieved from https://www-proquest- com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/docview/744237050/fulltext/104562A7DE724CBBPQ/1? accountid=32521 

According to this article, those who break the law while they are under the age of eighteen face jail time. Even if the amenities may alter, criminality is deterred. Parliamentarians questioned juvenile detention in the 1970s. Juvenile criminals have mandatory minimum terms. Tougher sanctions have been enacted due to an increase in the number of "super predators" in the juvenile justice system. The data for the charts originates from a variety of sources. It is a significant contributor to the incarceration of juveniles. For public and private institutions, the graph covered the period 1977 to 2006. In the nine years following 1987, the rate of youth violence dropped by half and remained steady until 2007. Recidivism has not lessened no matter how long young people are locked up. 18-year-olds were included in a figure based on state facility statistics from 1985 to 2004. Crime has not decreased as a result of treating minors as adults. One theory was that the crimes resulted from minors near the adults who committed them. Some of the company's more senior employees assaulted the younger ones in various ways, including physical, verbal, and psychological. It was revealed in the case of Galloway vs. Texas that many youths were assaulted and denied access to mental health care. Soon after these revelations broke, the DOJ began looking into other organizations. Racism, abuse, and gang violence were revealed throughout the investigations. In some instances, the researcher said, the rates of young crime mirror adult crime rates. The failure of some reforms to the juvenile justice system could hurt children. Legislation's impact on adolescent criminals was examined in the thesis. The data came from state, private, and public institution records. The article's appeal was bolstered by extensive information on facilities and inmates. The writers' evidence and progress prove their claim.

Coupet, S. M. (2000). What to Do with the Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: The Role of Rhetoric and Reality about Youth Offenders in the Constructive Dismantling of the Juvenile Justice System. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148(4), 1303. https://doi-org.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/10.2307/3312844

This piece focuses on the crime and punishment of children. To execute its job correctly, the legal system must consider abuse, neglect, and other risk factors in children's lives. Young offenders' moral and ethical development and protection against delinquency should be the primary goals of reforming the juvenile justice system, according to a "restoring" approach. Youth crime rates have not reduced despite the juvenile justice system's shift from sentence to rehabilitation. According to the author's argument, incarceration is not the only option for dealing with criminal behavior among adolescents. We can improve the chances of at-risk adolescents becoming productive members of society if we assist them in dealing with underlying concerns.

Tate, D. C., Reppucci, N. D., & Mulvey, E. P. (1995). Violent juvenile delinquents: treatment effectiveness and implications for future action. The American Psychologist, v50(n9).

This article explains how to deal with adolescent offenders who are prone to violence. Biological, cognitive-behavioral, social, problem-solving, and multisystemic therapies are all included in the course curriculum (promise program). The paper aims to answer policymakers' queries about the efficacy of these interventions for adolescent aggression. As explained in this article, rather than using a "cookie-cutter" method to intervene with violent youth, practitioners should adopt a "cookie-cutter" approach that considers each young person's individuality and unique internal and external difficulties. The paper's experiment shows that teenagers have alternatives to punishment, which supports the idea.

Clark, M. D. (2009). Juvenile Justice and a Strengths Perspective: Complement or Clash? Reclaiming Children & Youth, 18(2), 21–26.

A strength-based, interventionist approach to juvenile justice is examined in this essay. When we look at the issue from the perspective of a young person's abilities, we may see how their talents, rather than adult compulsion, might bring about change. Testing adolescents' talents in forensic social work and positive psychology uncover and reinforces their abilities. According to a recent poll, young people were the ones who came up with the best answers. Positive reinforcement and empowerment are two of this article's most vital points. In the article, there is only one reference to the widespread use of the strengths approach. This article supports the commitment to prioritize counseling over punishment, but additional evidence is needed.

References

Bright, C. L., Ferrell, J., Winters, A. M., Betsinger, S., & Lee, B. T. (2018). Family-Centered Treatment, Juvenile Justice, and the Grand Challenge of Smart Decacration. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(5), 638-635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517730127

Calley, N. G. (2007). Integrating theory and research: The development of a research-based treatment program for juvenile male sex offenders. Journal of Counseling & Development. 85(2). 131-142. Retrieved from https://eds-a-ebscohost-com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=ef709e69-1761-4f1d-8e40- da26ee51ab44%40sessionmgr4006

Clark, M. D. (2009). Juvenile Justice and a Strengths Perspective: Complement or Clash? Reclaiming Children & Youth, 18(2), 21–26.

Coupet, S. M. (2000). What to Do with the Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: The Role of Rhetoric and Reality about Youth Offenders in the Constructive Dismantling of the Juvenile Justice System. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148(4), 1303. https://doi-org.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/10.2307/3312844

Fagan, J. (2010). The contradictions of juvenile crime and punishment. Daedalus. 139(3). 43-61. Retrieved from https://www-proquest-com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/docview/744237050/fulltext/104562A7DE724CBBPQ/1? accountid=32521

Kim, I., & Barkol, R. (2004). The "Safe School": A Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Model of Community Policing as an Expression of Democratic Processes. International Journal Of Educational Reform, 13(1), 27-45. doi: 10.1177/105678790401300103

Tate, D. C., Reppucci, N. D., & Mulvey, E. P. (1995). Violent juvenile delinquents: treatment effectiveness and implications for future action. The American Psychologist, v50(n9).