Analysis of Levitt’s Perspective on Parenting, Names, and Crime
Question
you must answer the 10 questions related to the movie “freakonomics” it is a discussion board post, i will upload pics of the instructions so you can just look and follow them


Solution
Analysis
of Levitt’s Perspective on Parenting, Names, and Crime
Question
1
Many parents rely on their instincts
to do their parenting job rather than depending on the books or classes. Most
parenting books are written by people who have perceptions about parenting that
they think are right but do not apply to all children. Levitt’s perspective on
parenting is that most classes or books consist of general information that
might not apply to all children. Various parents face parenting challenges that
could not be solved by relying on books or classes by people calling themselves
professionals. The film describes that many parents do not possess the right
instinct that can guide them in the upbringing of their children. Instead, they
rely on general information shared by authors and experts in parenting, but the
results do not reflect their children. Generally, the film highlights various
flaws that parenting books have, making them ineffective in grooming better
parents.
Question
2
As my teacher, you must follow
ethical practices in your profession that forbid helping students cheat in
their courses. The teacher’s work is to instill discipline, morals, and ethical
principles in students to make them better people in the future. Generally,
teachers serve the societal role of grooming students to be better society
members in the future. Therefore, helping students cheat in their course will
imply that the teacher wants them to be irresponsible in the future. As a
result, in no way as my teacher should you help me to cheat in my course.
Instead, the teacher should prohibit cheating and even initiate severe
punishment on any student caught cheating. Therefore, teachers will not help me
cheat in my course because that is against the ethically-accepted behaviors in
the teaching profession.
Question
3
Many parents are concerned about
their children’s names because they believe names are a big part of a child’s
future. Some universal beliefs are that names are essential in determining a
child’s future. Parents have great expectations from their children’s names
because they believe it affects their kid’s outcomes. Many parents want their
children to bear the names of successful and famous people in society.
Generally, a name has a magical power that can affect a child’s outcome
according to most traditions and cultures. However, some experts argue that a
child’s outcome is not necessarily influenced by name but by the neighborhood
they come from, parenting, and their family’s socioeconomic status.
Question
4
Labeling Theory postulates that a
name given to a child is likely to determine their behaviors and people’s
perception of them. In the film, a woman names her daughter “Temptress,” The
daughter grew up to become what her name suggests. The name Temptress is
associated with bad behaviors in society. The film indicates that the daughter
named “Temptress” started to reflect the name in her actions. Name a child “Winner”
and “Loser” automatically reflect their personality. Throughout the film, where
children are given different names, Labeling theory tends to fit every time in
their actions. Many children given various names reflect their personalities.
However, experts disagree with the Labeling theory, claiming that a child’s
outcome is determined by other factors apart from a name, such as their environment.
Question
5
Many people charged with hiring labor
tend to be attracted to candidates with the names they perceive are similar to
them. The outcomes of the “Resume Name Study” could have differed if racial or
ethnic minority-specific names were used because the recruiters could get less
attracted to names they consider to be from minority groups. Therefore, the
recruiters would consider taking a few ethnic minority-specific names. Similarly,
male-dominated organizations prefer hiring more males than females since they
resonate with their gender. For example, resumes with more male names will be
considered for shortlisting than female names. In the case of neutral gender
names, the number of resumes will balance between males and females. Other
factors that may affect gender-radicalized preferences in employment are family
background, education levels, and social status. Recruiters may prefer names
associated with prominent personalities to work at their organizations
regardless of gender.
Question
6
Many parents in the African culture
feel that it is essential to observe their cultural heritage as far as the
naming of their children is concerned. However, the wave of racial or ethnic discrimination
pushes many black American parents to name their children with white names to
fit into society. Generally, using white instead of ethnic names is for the
good of their children’s future, especially in securing employment. If I were
an African American, I would not give my child an ethnic name because that
would be detrimental to their future. American society is known for racial and
ethnic discrimination; therefore, I would not want my children to suffer
because of an ethnic name.
Question
7
Some people can eat anything. Such
people are known as “Tarrare,” Their name reflects their eating habits. They
can eat anything, whether it is nutritious or not, as long as they get
satisfied. Their condition is considered a unique talent because not everyone
is gifted with such a digestive system. “Tarrare” people rarely complain of
stomach complications, unlike many who try to be careful with what they eat.
Question
8
Several loopholes make it easy for
young people to access guns and engage in crime. The major reason for the
prevalence of crime and gun possession despite the laws is corruption in the
justice system. Authorities charged with the responsibility of licensing only
qualified people to possess guns receive bribes from unqualified people and
license them. The crime rate is unlikely to reduce if there is no collaboration
between the federal government, lawmakers, gun control departments, media, and
communities. Lawmakers initiating crime prevention policies are ineffective
because they fail at the implementation stage. People charged with implementing
gun laws and policies are reluctant to prevent rogue people from acquiring
firearms resulting in widespread crimes. The media can also be blamed for the
failure in the efforts to control crime and gun possession. They are not
adequately doing their job of reporting the rot witnessed in the licensing
department, where unqualified people easily buy their way into crime.
Question
9
Levitt’s assertion on a decrease in
crime was due to the legalization of abortion by the Supreme Court decision in
1973 that he claimed made a significant impact. The assertions did not consider
the police efforts and the improvement in the justice system. The Harvard
economist presented data that indicated how the crime rate dropped over two
decades since the Supreme Court decision. However, considering other factors
that lead to crime, abortion law could be least equated to the reasons for the
decrease in the crime rate. Levitt’s assertion did not consider political and
social strategies employed by the justice system in combating crime. Generally,
an increase in childbirth does not fall under the factors that lead to the rise
in the crime rate in society. The assertion also did not that economic
strategies that ensure increased employment opportunities could reduce crime
rates among the youths and society.
Question
10
The claim about “no racial or class
implications” for Levitt’s findings on the decrease in crime rate due to
abortion is overrated. Crime rates in society are generally instigated by
economic, political, and social factors. Levitt’s claims on the decrease in
crime rate can be considered among the social factors but not as a significant
factor in analyzing crime levels in society. For example, populations from
low-income areas are more likely to experience growth in crime than in high-end
neighborhoods. Crime levels generally depend on the socioeconomic status of the
community regardless of their population size. Other factors such as historical
injustices also instigate crime, but a decrease can be witnessed when
addressed. Therefore, Levitt’s argument on there being “no racial or class
implications” in his theory is questionable.




About Author
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!
We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.
Find the right expert among 500+
We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.
View all writers