C and W PSY DB3

Posted on: 26th May 2023

Question

Read the Passage! Do you agree or disagree, or can you relate to his or her opinion in the post? Can you add any thoughts or additional information that you may have found concerning their topic?

 There are many ways to identify whether a source is credible or not credible. Doing your research and investigation about a source and whether it is credible is important. Having reliable sources gives more credibility to your research and writing pertaining to the field. Many techniques that are used to identify a credible source are not reliable on their own but are reliable when paired with other techniques. The more reliable the source is the more reliable the material that is written will be. Some techniques that are used are identifying whether the source is scholarly or popular, identifying whether the source is a primary source or secondary source, identifying what kind of domain is used, and researching the reliability of the author or organization (Purdue OWL).  

It is important to avoid things that are for promotion and search for educational-based content. One factor that helps determine whether a source is reliable is if the source is peer reviewed. According to the American Psychological Association, peer-reviewing is important feedback on research and writings from collogues with similar expertise (APA). For example, A clinical psychologist who specializes in abnormal psychology in children might peer review a study on bipolar disorder in adolescence. Peer reviewing is a great source to see if a writing is reliable and meets the requirements of the peers in that field (APA). It also shows that there is consistency between the information in this study and the information already known by the professionals in that field (APA). The downside to peer reviews like many reviews there is an opportunity for bias (APA). That is why the process of peer-reviewing is so In-depth and requires an important level of professionalism (APA).  

Certain sources are very well known for not being reliable, the most popular being Wikipedia. Wikipedia is known as an unreliable source because anyone has access to change or put in false information without research and evidence behind it (Purdue OWL). This creates a huge likelihood of bias. Propaganda and promotion that is favored by the people putting in the content. The same possibilities are in ads and news content (Purdue OWL).  This is why it is best to use education-based information from reliable databases (Purdue OWL).

image description Top level essay Service Our professional unemployed professors are waiting for your signal to offer you the best academic writing service you so deserve.
illustration of a woman populating a checklist.

Solution

C and W PSY DB3

I agree it is important to identify credible sources because they give credibility to research. I would also add that credible sources are not biased and are supported with reliable evidence (Pehlivanoglu et al., 2021). Therefore, using credible sources ensures that research or the written material is reliable. I also acknowledge that number of techniques can be used to determine the credibility of a source. They include determining whether the source is primary or secondary, whether the reference is popular or scholarly, determining the type of domain used, and conducting research on the organization's or author's reliability. In addition, other techniques that can be implemented to identify whether a source is dependable include identifying whether a source is up-to-date, identifying if the source is supported by proof, and identifying if the source is appropriate to research (Pehlivanoglu et al., 2021).

I also agree that a peer-reviewed source is reliable because it has been reviewed by other authors in the same field of study. It is also worth pointing out that a researcher should also ensure the peer-reviewed article is up-to-date. This is because a source can be peer-reviewed, but the information is biased. Therefore, material written from sources with biased information is not reliable. Finally, I agree that Wikipedia is one of the sources that are not reliable because individuals can edit and add false information that is not supported by evidence. In addition, researchers should also be keen when using social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram (Baxter et al., 2019). Nonprofessional individuals can post false information that is not reliable. 

References

Baxter, I., Craig, A., Cotton, E., & Liney, T. (2019). Social media addiction: An industry of Unreliability. BMJ, 365. https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l4281.full

Pehlivanoglu, D., Lin, T., Deceus, F., Heemskerk, A., Ebner, N. C., & Cahill, B. S. (2021). The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility in the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1-12. https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-021-00292-3

Andrea Gibson

Andrea Gibson

1710 reviews | 1710 orders
  • Do you need help with an
    online class, essay or assignment?

  • Find the right expert among 500+

    We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.

    View all writers

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!

We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.

Profile picture of ProfWriter

ProfWriter

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Intermediate

Total orders 7134

Competences
Philosophy
English
Archaeology
Profile picture of ProfWriter1

ProfWriter1

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Intermediate

Total orders 3848

Competences
Astronomy
Agriculture
Military sciences
Profile picture of Revaz Pataradze

Revaz Pataradze

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Elite

Total orders 1020

Competences
History
Sociology
Health sciences and medicine
Profile picture of Pro. Nicole

Pro. Nicole

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Advanced

Total orders 1026

Competences
Human Resources (HR)
Macro & Micro economics
Management
Profile picture of Nicole Ashton

Nicole Ashton

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Advanced

Total orders 1197

Competences
English
Archaeology
Gender & Sexual Studies
Profile picture of Prof. Jordan

Prof. Jordan

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Elite

Total orders 1539

Competences
English
Linguistics
Gender & Sexual Studies
Profile picture of Andrea Gibson

Andrea Gibson

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Elite

Total orders 1710

Competences
Linguistics
Archaeology
Sociology
Profile picture of Hanna preston

Hanna preston

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Advanced

Total orders 2223

Competences
English
Archaeology
Political Science
Profile picture of Gilbert Rights

Gilbert Rights

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Elite

Total orders 1005

Competences
English
Business
Marketing
Profile picture of Dr. Payne

Dr. Payne

5

( Reviews)

Staff Level Advanced

Total orders 1836

Competences
Linguistics
Gender & Sexual Studies
Business
View all writers

Find the right expert among 500+

We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.

View all writers