Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act
Question
Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act
Write a 2-3 page paper describing how Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act compares to your own state’s act, if they have one. If your state does not have one, then describe if you believe your state should follow Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act. The paper should be done in APA format. Title page and reference page not included in page count. Must include at least 3 scholarly sources


Solution
Oregon’s
Death with Dignity Act
The handful of states
adopting a death with dignity legislation has increased considerably. These
laws, also known as “assisted suicide” or “right to die” legislation, permit
terminally ill patients to end their lives quietly rather than suffer a painful
and prolonged death (Simmons, 2018). One of the most widely used terms to define
the practice of a lethally sick person ingesting prescribed medication to expedite
death is “dying with dignity.” In truth, Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act
stipulates that terminating one’s life in conformity with the Act is not
regarded as suicide.
However, many oppose this
practice. I believe that Oregon’s death with dignity Act is unethical and
unprofessional. Therefore, the state that I live in should not follow the
practice. Such actions claim to diminish the importance and respect for all
human rights. I am concerned that the established rules will fail to prevent
the “slippery slope” from leading to the use of this Act involuntarily and, as
a result, the intentional depreciation of the lives of those closest to us
(Sperling, 2018). Legalizing it will put pressure on terminally ill people to
comply, relieving their families and friends of the financial and emotional
load of having to care for them and worry about them.
Taking another person’s
life should never be justified, regardless of the context. Under any event or
situation, human life must be safeguarded. Medication has progressed in recent
years to extend man’s life span; nevertheless, the same medicine cannot be used
to take the lives of those designed to protect and heal. If Oregon’s Death with
Dignity Act is permitted and administered at our institutions, the same ones
supposed to deliver health care to the public, it would have been a conflict of
ideals and purposes (Girald, n.d).
No doctor can predict
when a person or a patient will die with certainty. Therefore, legalizing this
Act will result in many unjustified deaths of patients who could have been
saved if sophisticated treatments had been available. Furthermore, legalizing
it will embolden lawbreakers and, as a result, increase the public’s suspicion
of medical professionals. Apart from these considerations, abiding by Oregon’s
Death with Dignity Act would reduce our hospitals’ quality of medical care
(Sulmasy et al., 2016). This will happen because research businesses will no
longer see the need to investigate better treatment options. After all, they
will have become complacent in their work.
Oregon’s Death with
Dignity Act is immoral and may be the most significant disadvantage. Most major
religions across the globe believe it ethically wicked to end one’s own life
regardless of the situation. For example, Roman Catholics believe that this is
murder and that neither the church nor society should condone it. Although
Hindus believe that assisting in the death of an individual may be the best way
to alleviate their suffering, they also believe that this will disrupt the
balance of life. Reincarnation and compassion killing are prohibited in Islam
(Girald, n.d). Some religions, however, are not entirely opposed to mercy
killing.
Oregon’s Death with
Dignity Act should not be acceptable since it will add to many societal issues.
Many cultures around the world consider human life to be sacred. As a result,
it should be taken into account. Many cultures around the world consider human
life to be sacred. As a result, it should be taken into account. Legalizing this
Act will only reduce the sanctity of human life and prove it ineffective. It
may also lead to individuals pretending to be sick to partake in death given to
them. Many religions discourage people from taking on God’s obligations. As
stated in the preceding arguments, this Act must not be legalized.
References
Girald, R. Arguments
for and against assisted suicide and euthanasia | CARE. CARE. Retrieved
from https://care.org.uk/cause/assisted-suicide/arguments-for-and-against-assisted-suicide-and-euthanasia.
Simmons, K. M. (2018).
Suicide and death with dignity. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 5(2),
436.
Sperling, S. K. (2018).
Oregon’s death with dignity act. JAMA oncology, 4(5),
747-748.
Sulmasy, D. P.,
Travaline, J. M., Mitchell, L. A., & Ely, E. W. (2016). Non-faith-based
arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. The
Linacre Quarterly, 83(3), 246-257.




About Author
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Essay Writers!
We have subject matter experts ready 24/7 to tackle your specific tasks and deliver them ON TIME, ready to hand in. Our writers have advanced degrees, and they know exactly what’s required to get you the best possible grade.
Find the right expert among 500+
We hire Gradewriters writers from different fields, thoroughly check their credentials, and put them through trials.
View all writers